Factors Affecting real estate Value of your house

Property value assessment frequently appears just like a summary practice. To an average joe, it could even appear as though the so-known as pros who appraise houses are simply setting prices depending on how they think in regards to a property. However, there's a typical through which these evaluation professionals base their value presumptions on. You will find factors that determine the need for a house, and when you are searching to market your house, it might be to your advantage to be aware what these factors are.

The main component that determines the cost of the rentals are its location. If this involves property concerns, location is easily the most apparent qualifying criterion of worth. Location is essential for commercial qualities since it determines potential profit. The more busy the region, the greater the worthiness an industrial property may have.

This type of standard isn't only at commercial qualities. Real estate value of your house can also be based on its location. It's closeness to commercial institutions can increase the need for your house.

The nearby neighbourhood is another main factor in appraising your house. If you reside inside a clean and safe neighbourhood, it will likely be much simpler to market your house. In case your community has an optimistic status, the need for your house would certainly rise.

The important thing for you to get a great value for your house is understanding who your buyer is and what your buyer values. An elder couple might value a residential area's closeness to fireplace and police stations. Individuals with children might contemplate it essential that a house is near to good public schools and parks. Youthful couples might should you prefer a location that's near to malls and restaurants. You should look at many of these factors in your assessment of real estate value of your house. Prior to selling your house, make a listing of advantages your house likes because of its location.

Location is another thing in thinking about the need for a house, but it's only some of the factor you should look at. They physical qualities of your house are simply as vital. The number of square-meters does your house occupy? How would be the structural conditions from the walls? The number of rooms does your house have? It is possible to fire place? How healthy may be the grass around the lawn? Do you know the utility rates in your town? Each one of these concerns should be thought about when assessing real estate value of your house.

Finally, opt for the healthiness of real estate market. The optimum time to market your house is before a fiscal recession. Property values go lower using the market. Throughout an financial crisis, so many people are attempting to sell their houses. The supply of cheap deals makes selling difficult. With many different competition, people often sell houses below their market price. Selling your house throughout this time around might not be the very best decision and really should simply be done like a last measure.

However, a fiscal recession is the greatest time to purchase a residential or commercial property since it is at this time around when real estate worth of numerous qualities reaches their cheapest.

Regardless, whether you are purchasing or selling, the most crucial factor will be well-informed. The greater value factors you know about, the greater your choices is going to be. In real estate industry, understanding is energy and knowledge is easily the most reliable type of currency.

Surprise! Dodd Frank cost passed on to consumers

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan defended the bank's decision to impose a $5 debit card fee on customers next year, saying it was needed, in part, to recoup billions of dollars in costs from complying with Dodd-Frank law. "I have an inherent duty as a CEO of a publicly held company to get a return for my shareholders," he said at the Aspen Institute in Washington. "At the same time, I have an inherent duty to do a great job for my customers." He wouldn't say if other Bank of America fees would be raised. He said the bank — the nation's largest mortgage lender through its purchase of Countrywide Financial — is trying to work through the backlog of its mortgage foreclosures and "find a resolution" with the state attorneys general suing Bank of America and other banks over their mortgage practices.

Refinance Applications Increase

Mortgage applications increased 4.1 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending August 12, 2011. The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 4.1 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 3.6 percent compared with the previous week and was 13.5 percent lower than a year ago. The Refinance Index increased 8.0 percent from the previous week, but was 16.3 percent lower than the same week last year. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 9.1 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 10.1 percent compared with the previous week and was 1.1 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

“Unprecedented volatility in the stock market last week amid additional signs that the economy has slowed led to further drops in mortgage rates, with the 15-year rate teaching a new low for the MBA survey,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President
of Research and Economics. Fratantoni continued, “The big differences in refinance volumes were likely driven by the decisions of some lenders not to drop rates last week, largely due to the need to manage their pipelines.” The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 6.9 percent. The four week moving average is down 2.2 percent for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 10.1 percent for the Refinance Index. The adjustable-rate mortgage
(ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.8 percent from 6.1 percent of total applications from the previous week. The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.32 percent from 4.37 percent. The 30-year fixed contract rate has decreased for three straight weeks and is at a new low
for this year.

Home ownership at 1998 levels

The U.S. homeownership rate in the second quarter dropped to its lowest level in 13 years, according to the Census Bureau, with analysts expecting even more drops ahead. The homeownership rate fell to 65.9%, down one percentage point from a year ago. It's the lowest level measured since the first quarter of 1998. Analysts at Capital Economics said this means the homeownership rate built during the housing boom has been "completely wiped out" by its bust. "The poor economic climate, the double dip in house prices, the high number of foreclosures and tight credit conditions are all reasons why the homeownership rate will continue to fall," analysts said.

The rate remained highest in the Midwest at 70%, followed by 68.2% in the South, 63% in the Northeast and 60.3% in the West. Since the second quarter of 2007, the homeownership rate in the West has dropped more than four full percentage points.
Homeownership for younger consumers has become even more sparse. According to the Census Bureau, the rate among Americans younger than 35 years old dropped to 37.5% from 39% one year ago. This, analysts said, is a sign credit has tightened for younger consumers. With unemployment elevated for this cohort, as well, the rate could continue to fall in coming quarters. "With another 3 million foreclosures in the pipeline and no sign of a major improvement in credit conditions or the labor market, demand for owner-occupied housing is likely to remain weak for some years yet," Capital Economics analysts said.

Study Reveals Original Foreclosure-Related Documents Often Do Not Exist

Posted by Carole VanSickle on Tuesday, July 19th 2011

If a lender has not been paid in months or years and believes that they can convert a property to a performing investment, then they are going to have a very high interest in foreclosing. However, in many cases, if they had to use real, legitimate, original documents to carry out that process, it simply would never happen. Why? Because the originals simply do not exist[1]. Reuters calls this “one of the overlooked legacies of the housing boom,” and explains in a new report that “in the rush to make new home loans and sell them off as fast as possible…the original lenders…destroyed original documents or never turned them over as required.” As a result, promissory notes and mortgages frequently never made it to the end-buyer – or even just the next guy in line. This means that “many pension funds, insurance companies and hedge funds that invested in [investor] trusts never got formal title to the mortgages they had paid for.” And that means that when it comes time to foreclose, they may have no choice but to use doctored or replicated documents in order to do so. Analysts speculate that the reason that there has not been an audit or an investigation of this issue may be simply that “if the extent of the problem became known, the housing market might worsen.” For example, the country’s largest sub-prime lender (it collapsed in 2007) almost never endorsed promissory notes or assigned mortgages to the trusts that bought its mortgages, meaning that trusts may be out millions of dollars and a millions of homes could end up with clouds on their titles.

don't let the numbers fool you

"Let me preface with an apology for the huge supply of numbers in this post, but if you can make it through them all, I think you will get the picture I'm drawing here. The so-called 'shadow inventory' of residential properties is falling, according to a new report from CoreLogic. This is the number of homes with seriously delinquent loans (90+ days), loans in the foreclosure process and bank-owned homes which are not yet listed for sale. The supply as of April 2011 declined to 1.7 million units, representing a five months' supply. This is down from 1.9 million units, also a five months' supply, from a year ago. 'The decline was due to fewer new delinquencies and the high level of distressed sales, which helped reduce the number of outstanding distressed loans,' according to the report.

Good news, no? Wait. There's more: 'In addition to the current shadow inventory, there are 2 million current negative equity loans that are more than 50% or $150,000 'upside down.' These current but underwater loans have increased risk of entering the shadow inventory if the owners' ability to pay is impaired while significantly underwater.' And then there's this other report from Lender Processing Services (LPS), which also reports a drop in newly delinquent loans, but gives the actual, mind-numbing numbers of loans in trouble:

- Number of properties that are 30+ days past due, but not in foreclosure: (A) 4,187,000

- Number of properties that are 90+ days delinquent, but not in foreclosure: 1,921,000

- Number of properties in foreclosure pre-sale inventory: (B) 2,164,000

- Number of properties that are 30+ days delinquent or in foreclosure: (A+B) 6,350,000

There are more than six million properties in distress, a third of those in foreclosure. According to yesterday's monthly home sales report from the National Association of Realtors, less than five million homes will sell this year, at the current sales pace. There are currently 3.72 million existing homes for sale, representing a 9.3 months supply; that does not include newly built homes nor does it include that six million number. This vast supply varies from state to state of course, but the overall effect is downward pressure on home prices nationally. I was interested to see a survey released today by Robert Shiller's MacroMarkets group (of the Case Shiller Home Price Indices). Every month he asks a group of 108 economists, real estate experts and investment strategists for their home price predictions. June's survey found the group's overall expectations have reached the lowest level since the survey started over a year ago, but, 'It is apparent that a significant majority of our panelists believe that the bottom for home prices arrived in the first quarter or will arrive sometime before year-end,' writes Shiller.

But wait, there's more: The group of 69 panelists who are currently forecasting a 2011 turning point predict less than two% average annual growth in nominal home prices over the five-year
period ending December 2015. Shiller added, 'If it were to materialize, such a scenario might be better described as a forecast of price stability rather than a rebound. A 2%-a-year home price increase will not inspire a lot of consumer confidence. Given prevailing inflation expectations, this
forecast implies virtually no change in real home values going forward.' So I'm faced with a national picture of over 6 million homes with distressed loans, a 9 month supply of existing homes, a smattering of new construction and no home price growth for at least the next four years. Should I buy?"

hard to make a call on housing

[Friday's] report on consumer confidence, or the striking lack of it, is yet another sign that housing is going to be in a very sticky state for a while. It's hard to say whether housing is weighing on confidence or lack of confidence is weighing on housing; the answer lies somewhere in the middle. Next week is a big week for housing because we get the all-important readings on existing and new home sales for May. The pending home sales index, based on contracts signed, not closings, fell dramatically in April, and that has the housing prognosticators building another arc for the flood of bad news yet to come. Home builder sentiment fell in June, largely based on competition from distressed properties and high material costs, but you can bet the builders know we're in for some tough sales numbers in their market as well.

I know I've said this before, but here I go again: All real estate is local, but confidence is national. Potential summer buyers, who are historically few and far between, will be watching the national numbers, as they try to time the bottom of the market, which is of course impossible to do. You can't time the bottom of this market, because it will likely bounce along the bottom for several years. You also have no historical perspective because we've never seen a crash like this ever before. The two greatest factors that will keep us bouncing are the huge volume of distressed properties and uncertainty over the direction of new regulation in the mortgage market.

Regulators pushed back the deadline for a huge decision on risk retention for the mortgage market, and that has talk abounding that the entire proposal is going back to the drawing board. This is the proposal that would require, among many other things, a 20% down payment on loans for them to be exempt from risk retention. Without that, banks would have to hold 5% risk on their books when securitizing the loan.

All this uncertainty in the mortgage market, piled on top of all kinds of new regulations now going into action, just makes lending more expensive for the banks and borrowing more expensive for consumers. It's no surprise that confidence in housing is so low, despite the fact that now may in fact be one of the best times to get into the housing market. You just have to have a long view, which foreign buyers apparently have but Americans sorely lack.

foreigners jump into real estate market

"Falling home prices may be plaguing the US economy, but they are candy to foreign investors, who already have a weak dollar on their side. Buyers from overseas spent roughly $41 billion on US residential real estate last year, a bump up from the previous year. US real estate agents report a surge this Spring especially, as foreign buyers see continued pressure on home prices and ample bargains. 'I don’t think they’re so concerned about the prices dropping as they are about getting value for their money,' says Rick Ambrose, a Coldwell Banker agent in Lake Mohawk, NJ. Ambrose and his colleague Mary Pat Spekhardt recently hosted two groups of Japanese investors searching for homes on the scenic lake just about an hour outside of New York City. 'They can work here, be close to the city, be close to their corporations and still feel like they’re on vacation. I think that’s really what grabbed everybody.

That’s what got them,' says Spekhardt. The group of about 35 from Japan also toured properties in Las Vegas and Los Angeles, which are more popular choices among foreign investors.

A new survey by Trulia.com that tracks searches from potential foreign buyers found LA ranked number one in potential interest traffic, trailed by New York City, Cape Coral, Fl, Fort Lauderdale, FL and Las Vegas. The greatest interest is from buyers in the UK, Canada and Australia. 'Prices now in the US are generally 30-40% off from the peak. In addition, the weakness of the dollar gives the Japanese an advantage, as it does the Europeans, of another 20-25% off, so they’re seeing real bargains and opportunities,' notes Ambrose. The interest is pretty widespread, with Brazilians trolling Miami and Russians and Chinese hunting in Chicago, according to Trulia's survey.

What's so interesting to me, though, is that foreigners are so much more ready to jump into the market now than US investors. Granted, they have, as noted, the weak dollar on their side, but they also seem to have a longer term view. US buyers are so afraid to lose a little in the short term on paper, they don't realize they could gain a lot in the long term. Of course foreign buyers are largely using cash, which many US buyers are lacking. Credit, or lack thereof, is playing against the US investor. Prices in Miami are actually beginning to recover, especially in the condo market, thanks to foreign buyers, so much so that the foreigners are beating out the Americans.

I remember all the rage a long time ago when the Japanese were buying up commercial real estate in New York City. Everyone was so appalled. Not so much now, even up in Lake Mohawk, NJ...'It isn’t popular. It is unforeseen territory, and it’s unique. I think it’s a very smart choice. It’s not where everyone is looking,' says Spekhardt."

US economy "bumbling along"

The US economy is just "bumbling along" and creating an uncertainty among business that is likely to stifle hiring and growth, says investor Wilbur Ross, fund manager and head of W.L. Ross & Co. Ross blamed Washington policies for much of the
problems, from the lack of a housing recovery to the recent controversy in which the Obama administration is trying to block Boeing from building a plant in a right-to-work state. "It's not going to be a 'W' or a 'V' or an 'L' (recovery) or another
alphabet letter," said Ross. "It's going continue to be punctuation—dots, dashes, question marks, exclamation points,one strong month, one weak month—a very fragile economy."

That lack of direction could stand in the way of businesses that want to expand. "This kind of thing is bad because it's unsettling to companies," he said. "Business has a terrible time adjusting to uncertainty. Good news they can adjust to, bad news
they can adjust to. Uncertainty makes it very, very hard to make long-term commitments." Businesses also are facing weak consumer spending. Unemployment remains mired at 9.1 percent while housing prices recently have double dipped despite aggressive efforts in Washington to stem the crisis. "The consumer still hasn't been
rehabilitated," Ross said. "All the meddling in the real estate side of life has not fixed residential real estate. If anything I think it's made it worse because it's extending out the foreclosure time lines and putting more uncertainty and more
downward pressure."

Ross also wondered about the state of job creation considering the battle the National Labor Relations Board has waged against Boeing. The agency contends that Boeing broke the law when it moved a plant to South Carolina, where workers are not required
to belong to a union. Boeing contends that even though it has a unionized work force it also can build plants in right-to-work states. Some in Congress have called on cutting funding to the NLRB on ground that the agency has overstepped its authority.
For Ross, the issue comes down to the kind of message the administration is sending at a time when job creation is at a premium. "Who in American business is going to have confidence to build a new factory, add employees, if you're not even sure
you can build the factory where you want to?" he said. "You can't have social experimenting interfering with turning the economy around. And I think that's what's going on here. It's social experimenting instead of building the economy."

Existing homes sales up

Existing homes increased 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.36 million in January from a downwardly revised 5.22 million in December, and are 5.3 percent above the 5.09 million level in January 2010. This is the first time in seven months that sales activity was higher than a year earlier. A parallel NAR practitioner survey2 shows first-time buyers purchased 29 percent of homes in January, down from 33 percent in December and 40 percent in January 2010 when an extended tax credit was in place. Investors accounted for 23 percent of purchases in January, up from 20 percent in December and 17 percent in January 2010; the balance of sales were to repeat buyers. All-cash sales rose to 32 percent in January from 29 percent in December and 26 percent in January 2010. All-cash purchases are at the highest level since NAR started measuring these purchases monthly in October 2008, when they accounted for 15 percent of the market. The average of all-cash deals was
20 percent in 2009, rising to 28 percent last year.

The national median existing-home price3 for all housing types was $158,800 in January, down 3.7 percent from January 2010. Distressed homes edged up to a 37 percent market share in January from 36 percent in December; it was 38 percent in January 2010. Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 5.1 percent to 3.38 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.6-month supply4 at the current sales pace, down from an 8.2-month supply in December. The inventory supply is at the lowest level since December 2009 when there was a 7.3-month supply. Single-family home sales rose 2.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.69 million in January from 4.58 million in December, and are 4.9 percent higher than the 4.47 million level in January 2010. The median existing single-family home price was $159,400 in January, down 2.7 percent from a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales increased 4.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 670,000 in January from 640,000 in December, and are 7.9 percent above the 621,000-unit pace one year ago. The median existing condo price5 was $154,900 in January, which is 10.2 percent below January 2010. Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast fell 4.6 percent to an annual pace of 830,000 in January from a spike in December and are 1.2 percent below January 2010.

The median price in the Northeast was $236,500, which is 4.0 percent below a year ago. Existing-home sales in the Midwest rose 1.8 percent in January to a level of 1.14 million and are 3.6 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $126,300, which is 3.2 percent below January 2010. In the South, existing-home sales increased 3.6 percent to an annual pace of 2.02 million in January and are 8.0 percent higher than January 2010. The median price in the South was $136,600, down 2.1 percent from a year ago. Existing-home sales in the West rose 7.9 percent to an annual level of 1.37 million in January and are 7.0 percent above January 2010. The median price in the West was $193,200, down 5.7 percent from a year ago.

NAR - GSE's should maintain public involvement

According to the National Association of Realtors’ recommendations for restructuring the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), continued government participation in the secondary mortgage market is essential to ensuring affordable and available home mortgages to qualified consumers when private lenders withdraw from the market. NAR’s recommended plan is to restructure the entities as government-chartered, non-shareholder owned authorities that protect taxpayers and ensure continued access to affordable mortgages for consumers who are willing and able to assume the responsibilities of the American Dream of home ownership. NAR believes the previous structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with private profits and taxpayer loss must never recur; however, without some level of government backing of the most basic, simple mortgages – such as the 30-year fixed rate product – interest rates and mortgage fees will be notably higher for consumers and could severely restric
t access to credit, especially during down or disruptive markets. The recent economic downturn, for example, caused private capital to flee the marketplace; government backing of residential mortgages was critical in providing capital to borrowers and without their support the financial crisis could have been far worse.

NAR encourages private market solutions and innovations such as covered bonds for less traditional mortgages. However, a full privatization across all mortgage products will inevitably put taxpayers at risk. Given the very high concentration in the banking industry, the market will be vulnerable to tacit collusion and too-big-to-fail mistakes. The restructured GSEs under NAR’s plan would guarantee or ensure a wide range of safe, reliable mortgage products such as 15- and 30-year fixed rate loans. Sound and sensible loan underwriting standards would need to be established. NAR’s plan would require the entities to be fully self-financing and subject to tight regulations on product, revenue generation and usage in a way that ensures they can accomplish their mission and protect taxpayer dollars.

Cheaper to buy than to rent in 72% of largest U.S. cities

Despite the rising number of renters across the country, it is cheaper to buy a home rather than rent one in 72 percent of the 50 largest cities in the U.S., according to an index released by real estate search and marketing site Trulia.

"Since the start of the 'Great Recession,' many former homeowners have flooded the rental market. Following the principles of supply and demand, renting has become relatively more expensive than buying in most markets," said Pete Flint, CEO and co-founder of Trulia, in a statement.

"Though necessary for achieving true economic recovery, stricter bank lending practices have also further aggravated the struggling housing market in the short term. Even highly qualified homebuyers face intense scrutiny on their income, savings, existing debt and credit history before they can get a mortgage loan."

Trulia's rent vs. buy index compares the median list price with the median rent on two-bedroom apartments, condominiums and townhomes listed on Trulia.com as of Jan. 10, 2011.

A price-to-rent ratio of 1 to 15 means that it's much cheaper to buy than to rent in a particular city. A ratio between 16 and 20 means that it's more expensive to rent than to buy, but, depending on the family's situation, buying could "make financial sense," the site said. Any ratio above 20 indicates that owning is much more costly than renting in a city.

In 36 out of 50 of the country's most populous cities, buying a two-bedroom home is less expensive than renting one. These cities include many areas that have been hit hard by foreclosures, such as Las Vegas, Phoenix and Fresno, Calif.
Article continues below

Price to Rent Ratio


In 10 cities, renting is cheaper, but buying might make more financial sense, according to Trulia. These cities include Los Angeles, Boston, and Fort Worth, Texas.

The index considers the total cost of homeownership compared to the total cost of renting. Calculations for the total cost of homeownership include mortgage principal and interest, property taxes, hazard insurance, closing costs at time of purchase, homeowners association dues, and private mortgage insurance. The homeownership cost calculation also includes tax advantages from mortgage interest, property tax and closing-cost deductions.

Calculations for total rental cost include rent and renters insurance.

The total cost of homeownership was highest, compared to the cost to rent, in New York; Seattle; Kansas City, Mo.; and San Francisco.

"Although owning a home is relatively more affordable in most cities, market conditions have caused an interesting demographic swap between traditional renters and buyers," said Tara-Nicholle Nelson, consumer educator for Trulia, in a statement. Nelson is also an Inman news columnist.

"For example, lifelong renters are seizing the opportunity to become homeowners while affordability is high. At the same time, a growing number of longtime homeowners are finding themselves tenants -- some by choice and others by necessity."

Through newly acquired startup Movity, Trulia created interactive maps comparing each city's population, projected job growth, and unemployment and foreclosure rates.

Ryland Shares Weaken With Builders Before Earnings

BOSTON -- Shares of Ryland Group Inc. were down 3% Wednesday morning ahead of the builder's second-quarter earnings report, which is expected to cross after the closing bell. "While most builders should post a fairly strong income statement this quarter, we believe Ryland will be usefully less robust, particularly on the cost side as gross margins remain quite subdued," wrote Ticonderoga Securities analyst Stephen East in an earnings preview this week. "Last quarter Ryland suffered from order declines and poor absorption rates, two trends that we believe could be virtually impossible to turn around in the second quarter given the tax credit expiration." The SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF was down more than 1% at last check Wednesday.


Copyright © 2010 MarketWatch, Inc.

Homebuyer Traffic Tumbled in May as First-Time Homebuyer Shopping Stalled

Homebuyer traffic nationwide tumbled in May, according to the latest
Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance Monthly Survey of Real Estate Market
Conditions. Most of the decline was attributable to first-time homebuyers who
sharply reduced their home shopping last month.
The survey's first-time homebuyer traffic index, which measures home shopping activity on a scale of 1 to 100, registered an anemic 35.1 in May. This was down from an index of 63.5 in April. Since September 2009, the index had never been below 50, which represents a flat, or neutral, condition in home purchase activity.
“The decline of first-time homebuyer traffic is undoubtedly related to the expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit,” stated Thomas Popik, research
director for Campbell Surveys. “Homebuyers had until April 30 to sign a purchase and sale agreement and receive the credit. Once we entered the month of May, the government stimulus disappeared.”
Thanks to its own tax break, California fared better than the country overall in
terms of first-time homebuyer activity, the survey found. The California index for first-time homebuyer traffic jumped to 63.1 in April, but still managed to stay relatively flat in May at 49.4, California enacted its own $10,000 credit for first-time homebuyers on May 1, the day after expiration of the federal tax credit.
Real estate agents responding to the survey commented on the decrease in homebuyer traffic in May, which ultimately will produce fewer closed transactions later in the summer. “The expiration of the tax credit caused a significant decline in buyer activity in May, with buyers who didn't get a suitable house in time for the tax credit opting to wait and see what happens to prices without the vailability of thell/Inside Mortgage tax credit. I expect to see a significant decrease in July's closed transactions,” commented an agent in Arizona.
“We have noticed a substantial decrease in activity since April 30th. There are a lot less Purchase and Sales Agreements being typed and other agents are complaining it's slow again,” stated an agent in Massachusetts. “I got no signed purchase agreements in May. I think the number of closed transactions in July will be very low,” added an agent in Indiana.
Traffic among current homeowners seeking to upsize or downsize also softened in the month of May, but to a lesser degree, the latest survey found. The nationwide index for current homebuyer traffic registered 45.5 in May, down from 55.2 in April. Expiration of the homebuyer tax credit for current homeowners was less of a factor because the tax credit dollar incentive was lower, both on an absolute basis and on a percent of transaction basis.
Interestingly, the proportion of closed transactions for first-time homebuyers also declined in May, furthering a trend first observed in April. In March, first-time homebuyers accounted for 48.2% of home purchases; by April their proportion had declined to 43.4%.
The trend continued in May, with first-time homebuyers accounting for 42.0% of home purchases. This decline is surprising since first-time homebuyers have until the end of June to close transactions and receive the federal tax credit.
A significant number of agents responding to the survey believe that transactions will rebound as homebuyers waiting out the end of the tax credit come back into a housing market that has fewer people bidding up the price of properties. “We saw a drop in activity for 3-4 weeks and now it is back to a more normal summer market. I anticipate that it will continue to increase and pick up after school gets out,” stated an agent in Minnesota.
“The first-time homebuyer tax credit, originally due to expire last November and then extended through the first half of 2010, appears to have depleted the pool of willing buyers earlier than expected,” commented Popik. “Whether this depletion is temporary or whether the market will rebound won’t be known until we measure traffic in June and July.”

Gaining More From Short Sale

The Process on real estate short-selling varies from one State to the other. However, the purpose of purchasing and short sale for agents or Investors does not. The reason that agents and investors play the real estate game is for the potential of gain. The chance to invest in a market on their own. Like a stock broker to stock, the average man can become the next real estate guru

The real estate business can be a lucrative investment for anybody. Knowing the ins and outs of the business will enable a higher rate of success and greater amount of financial gains. This can be a big disappointment for most people who involve themselves in this business without much research on the proper and legal proceedings that are involved in the real estate business. Even with the complicated process on short sales in real estate, it is still known to be among the very good ways of gaining real estate wealth. With the profitability of getting involved in the short sale business, secrets have been discovered and practiced by experts in the real estate's short sale sector.

Since the competition is huge in this very promising business, most of these secrets are hidden and not often shared openly to other agents. For a rookie, seeing all the frustration and headache the pre-foreclosure and short sale process brings can be intimidating. You may reach the brink of giving up on and admitting to failure and raising the white flag in real estate selling. However, you may be giving up a future of pleasure and financial enjoyment. This does not need to be the case; we have developed tools for you for your continuous venture in real estate.

You have vested a lot already, from the education, licensing and financial investments from the buying, to the legal process and renovations. This is not a great time for you to give up. We do not want you to give up, either. There are people like us that are not selfish on the information, we also want you to be successful and learn the expert way of the trade.

Inflated initial investment and expensive renovations and repair of the procured pre-foreclosed property will mean that you will end with a lower profit. Mis-management of the essential parts of buying and selling real estate in this market can be any real estate investor’s downfall. Not having an exit strategy in place prior to buying the home is another downfall of the real estate agent or investor. However having a system in place, financing with Creative Alternative Options is one of the many keys to the gates of wisdom.