BEREL Sunday International Investing Edition: Wells Fargo Turns to Ireland for Loan Portfolios

Posted by Carole VanSickle on Sunday, August 14th 2011

In a $1.4 billion deal, Wells Fargo has won the Bank of Ireland’s U.S. commercial-real-estate loan portfolio as the Irish bank attempts to deleverage its assets. The portfolio consists of 25 loans sold at close to face value and backed primarily by properties in New York, Boston and Washington[1]. The Bank of Ireland was ordered by Ireland’s financial regulator to deleverage by cutting the lender’s loan portfolio by $43 billion by the end of 2013. Wells Fargo also purchased an additional $1 billion in loans from Allied Irish Banks earlier this year and is now taking aim at a $9.5 billion portfolio of loans in the offing from the Anglo Irish Bank Corporation. The latter includes commercial “trophy properties” in New York City and Chicago.

JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are also after the Anglo Irish Bank portfolio and have submitted bids on it[2]. Most of the loans are expected to perform through maturity. The sale will also be the first of its kind, since “this is the first foreign bank to sell its entire U.S. loan portfolio, and it will be good test of the market,” said head of global real estate practice at law firm Greenberg Traurig, Robert Ivanhoe.

Do you think it’s a good thing that American lenders are buying back American loans, or should they be doing other things with these billions of dollars?

Mortgage markets in the U.S., which remain on government life support, could be rattled by the downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, potentially raising borrowing costs for consumers. Given the "sufficiently perilous" state of the U.S. mortgage market, a downgrade "can do nothing but harm the market," says Karen Shaw Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, a research firm in Washington. "The question is how much?" To be sure, no one knows for certain the impact of the unprecedented downgrade on the mortgage market, even if that market is fundamentally intertwined with the federal government.

One concern is that downgrades may trigger forced selling by mutual funds or foreign investors to comply with investor-specific capital requirements restricting them to assets rated triple-A. But analysts said that most institutional investors' rules for investing in government-backed mortgage debt aren't contingent on ratings. And with investors seeking traditional safe-haven assets such as Treasury and government-backed mortgage securities, "there just doesn't seem to be much else to invest in," says Andrew Davidson, a mortgage-industry consultant in New York. "What would people put
their money in if they sold their agency mortgages? It's hard to see what the trade is."

Mortgage rates are closely tied to yields on the 10-year Treasury note. Rising demand for Treasurys pushed down yields over the past two weeks, even as the threat of a U.S. default from the debt-ceiling debate in Washington dragged on, because investors looked for less risky assets amid concerns over the European debt crisis and the sluggish U.S. economy. Mortgage rates dropped to an eight-month low last week, with 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaging 4.39% for the week ended Thursday, according to a survey by Freddie Mac. Still, the uncertainty created by the downgrade has nvestors on edge. The interplay of a downgrade, on top of the euro-zone crisis and renewed fears over a double-dip recession in the U.S., could lead to increased volatility in mortgage markets. "There are so many moving parts to this that no one really knows how it will go," says Mr.Simon.

Study Reveals Original Foreclosure-Related Documents Often Do Not Exist

Posted by Carole VanSickle on Tuesday, July 19th 2011

If a lender has not been paid in months or years and believes that they can convert a property to a performing investment, then they are going to have a very high interest in foreclosing. However, in many cases, if they had to use real, legitimate, original documents to carry out that process, it simply would never happen. Why? Because the originals simply do not exist[1]. Reuters calls this “one of the overlooked legacies of the housing boom,” and explains in a new report that “in the rush to make new home loans and sell them off as fast as possible…the original lenders…destroyed original documents or never turned them over as required.” As a result, promissory notes and mortgages frequently never made it to the end-buyer – or even just the next guy in line. This means that “many pension funds, insurance companies and hedge funds that invested in [investor] trusts never got formal title to the mortgages they had paid for.” And that means that when it comes time to foreclose, they may have no choice but to use doctored or replicated documents in order to do so. Analysts speculate that the reason that there has not been an audit or an investigation of this issue may be simply that “if the extent of the problem became known, the housing market might worsen.” For example, the country’s largest sub-prime lender (it collapsed in 2007) almost never endorsed promissory notes or assigned mortgages to the trusts that bought its mortgages, meaning that trusts may be out millions of dollars and a millions of homes could end up with clouds on their titles.

don't let the numbers fool you

"Let me preface with an apology for the huge supply of numbers in this post, but if you can make it through them all, I think you will get the picture I'm drawing here. The so-called 'shadow inventory' of residential properties is falling, according to a new report from CoreLogic. This is the number of homes with seriously delinquent loans (90+ days), loans in the foreclosure process and bank-owned homes which are not yet listed for sale. The supply as of April 2011 declined to 1.7 million units, representing a five months' supply. This is down from 1.9 million units, also a five months' supply, from a year ago. 'The decline was due to fewer new delinquencies and the high level of distressed sales, which helped reduce the number of outstanding distressed loans,' according to the report.

Good news, no? Wait. There's more: 'In addition to the current shadow inventory, there are 2 million current negative equity loans that are more than 50% or $150,000 'upside down.' These current but underwater loans have increased risk of entering the shadow inventory if the owners' ability to pay is impaired while significantly underwater.' And then there's this other report from Lender Processing Services (LPS), which also reports a drop in newly delinquent loans, but gives the actual, mind-numbing numbers of loans in trouble:

- Number of properties that are 30+ days past due, but not in foreclosure: (A) 4,187,000

- Number of properties that are 90+ days delinquent, but not in foreclosure: 1,921,000

- Number of properties in foreclosure pre-sale inventory: (B) 2,164,000

- Number of properties that are 30+ days delinquent or in foreclosure: (A+B) 6,350,000

There are more than six million properties in distress, a third of those in foreclosure. According to yesterday's monthly home sales report from the National Association of Realtors, less than five million homes will sell this year, at the current sales pace. There are currently 3.72 million existing homes for sale, representing a 9.3 months supply; that does not include newly built homes nor does it include that six million number. This vast supply varies from state to state of course, but the overall effect is downward pressure on home prices nationally. I was interested to see a survey released today by Robert Shiller's MacroMarkets group (of the Case Shiller Home Price Indices). Every month he asks a group of 108 economists, real estate experts and investment strategists for their home price predictions. June's survey found the group's overall expectations have reached the lowest level since the survey started over a year ago, but, 'It is apparent that a significant majority of our panelists believe that the bottom for home prices arrived in the first quarter or will arrive sometime before year-end,' writes Shiller.

But wait, there's more: The group of 69 panelists who are currently forecasting a 2011 turning point predict less than two% average annual growth in nominal home prices over the five-year
period ending December 2015. Shiller added, 'If it were to materialize, such a scenario might be better described as a forecast of price stability rather than a rebound. A 2%-a-year home price increase will not inspire a lot of consumer confidence. Given prevailing inflation expectations, this
forecast implies virtually no change in real home values going forward.' So I'm faced with a national picture of over 6 million homes with distressed loans, a 9 month supply of existing homes, a smattering of new construction and no home price growth for at least the next four years. Should I buy?"

Hacker claims BOA hid mortgage errors

A hacker organization known as Anonymous released on Monday a series of e-mails by a former Bank of America (BOA) employee who claims they show how a division of the bank hid foreclosure information. The bank unit, Balboa Insurance, which deals in force-placed coverage, was acquired by BOA when it bought the mortgage lender Countrywide in 2008, and the e-mail messages involve removing information linking loans to certain documentation. The e-mails dating from November last year reveal a correspondence among Balboa employees in which they move to hide the record of certain documents "that went out in error." The documents were tied to loans by GMAC, a BOA client, according to the e-mails. "The following GMAC DTN's need to have the images removed from Tracksource/Rembrandt," an operations team manager at Balboa wrote. DTN refers to document-tracking number, and Tracksource/Rembrandt is an insurance-tracking system.

The response he receives: "I have spoken to my developer and she stated that we cannot remove the DTN's from Rembrandt, but she can remove the loan numbers, so the documents will not show as matched to those loans." Removing the loan numbers from the documents, according to the e-mails, was approved. A member of Anonymous said in an interview Monday that the purpose of his Web site was to bring attention to the wrongdoing of the banks. "The way the system is, it's made to cheat the average person," he said. A BOA spokesman told Reuters on Sunday that the documents had been stolen by a former Balboa employee, and were not tied to foreclosures. "We are confident that his extravagant assertions are untrue," he told the news service.

Obama tries to force mortgage deal

WSJ - Obama tries to force mortgage deal

The Obama administration is trying to push through a settlement over mortgage-servicing breakdowns that could force America's largest banks to pay for reductions in loan principal worth billions of dollars. Terms of the administration's proposal include a commitment from mortgage servicers to reduce the loan balances of troubled borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth, people familiar with the matter said. The cost of those writedowns won't be borne by investors who purchased mortgage-backed securities, these people said. If a unified settlement can be reached, some state attorneys general and federal agencies are pushing for banks to pay more than $20 billion in civil fines or to fund a comparable amount of loan modifications for distressed borrowers, these people said. But forging a comprehensive settlement may be difficult. A deal would have to win approval from federal regulators and state attorneys general, as well as some of the nation's largest mortgage ser
vicers, including Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co, and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Those banks declined to comment.

So far, most loan modifications have focused on shrinking monthly payments by lowering interest rates and extending loan terms. Banks, as well as mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have been shy to embrace principal reductions, in part due to concerns that many borrowers who can afford their loans will stop paying in the hope of being rewarded with a smaller loan. Several federal agencies have been scrutinizing the nation's largest banks over breakdowns in foreclosure procedures that erupted last fall. Last week, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said only a small number of borrowers had been improperly foreclosed upon. But the regulator raised concerns over inadequate staffing and weak controls over certain foreclosure processes.

A settlement must satisfy an unwieldy mix of authorities, including state attorneys general and regulators such as the newly formed Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, who support heftier fines. They must also appease banking regulators, such as the OCC, that are concerned penalties could be too stiff. "Nothing has been finalized among the states, and it's our understanding that the federal agencies we are in discussions with have not finalized their positions," said a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who is spearheading a 50-state investigation of mortgage-servicing practices.

MBA - foreclosures up delinquencies down

The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties decreased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 8.22% of all loans outstanding as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, a decrease of 91 basis points from the third quarter of 2010, and a decrease of 125 basis points from one year ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association's (MBA) National Delinquency Survey. The non-seasonally adjusted delinquency rate decreased 46 basis points to 8.93% this quarter from 9.39% last quarter. The percentage of loans on which foreclosure actions were started during the fourth quarter was 1.27%, down seven basis points from last quarter and up seven basis points from one year ago. The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure.

The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the fourth quarter was 4.63%, up 24 basis points from the third quarter of 2010 and up five basis points from one year ago. The serious delinquency rate, the percentage of loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure, was 8.57%, a decrease of 13 basis points from last quarter, and a decrease of 110 basis points from the fourth quarter of last year. The combined percentage of loans in foreclosure or at least one payment past due was 13.56% on a non-seasonally adjusted basis, a 22 basis point decline from 13.78% last quarter.

Jay Brinkmann, MBA's chief economist said "These latest delinquency numbers represent significant, across the board decreases in mortgage delinquency rates in the US. Total delinquencies, which exclude loans in the process of foreclosure, are now at their lowest level since the end of 2008. Mortgages only one payment past due are now at the lowest level since the end of 2007, the very beginning of the recession. Perhaps most importantly, loans three payments (90 days) or more past due have fallen from an all-time high delinquency rate of 5.02% at the end of the first quarter of 2010 to 3.63% at the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, a drop of 139 basis points or almost 28% over the course of the year. Every state but two saw a drop in the 90-plus day delinquency rate and the two increases were negligible."

"While delinquency and foreclosure rates are still well above historical norms, we have clearly turned the corner. Despite continued high levels of unemployment, the economy did add over 1.2 million private sector jobs during 2010 and, after remaining stubbornly high during the first half of 2010, first time claims for unemployment insurance fell during the second half of the year. Absent a significant economic reversal, the delinquency picture should continue to improve during 2011, Brinkmann said.

Mike Fratantoni, MBA's vice president for single family research said "While the foreclosure starts rate fell during the fourth quarter, the percentage of loans in foreclosure rose to equal the all-time high. The foreclosure inventory rate captures loans from the point of the foreclosure referral to exit from the foreclosure process, either through a cure (perhaps through a modification), a short sale or deed in lieu, or through a foreclosure sale. As we predicted last quarter, the percentage of loans in the foreclosure process increased in the fourth quarter, largely due to the foreclosure paperwork issues that were being addressed in September and October. These issues caused a temporary halt in foreclosure sales, particularly in states with judicial foreclosure regimes, such as New Jersey, Florida, and Illinois.

With fewer loans exiting the foreclosure process through sales, the foreclosure inventory rate naturally increased, even as fewer foreclosure starts meant that fewer loans entered the foreclosure process in the fourth quarter." "The share of loans in foreclosure in California and Florida combined was 36.0%, a decrease from 37.3% in the third quarter, and 39.3% a year ago. Over 24% of the loans in Florida are one payment or more past due or in the process of foreclosure, the highest rate in the nation, followed by Nevada at over 22%, compared to an average of 13.6% for the nation. Only eleven states saw an increase in their foreclosure start rate with Maryland seeing the largest increase."

Mortgage servicing crackdown expected

U.S. banking regulators are close to finalizing new national guidelines that will impact mortgage servicing shops after an interagency investigation revealed "significant weaknesses in mortgage servicing related to foreclosure oversight and operations," said John Walsh, the Acting Comptroller of the Currency, in prepared statements to be delivered before a Senate Banking panel today. "In general, the examinations found critical deficiencies and shortcomings in foreclosure governance processes, foreclosure document preparation processes, and oversight and monitoring of third-party law firms and vendors," Walsh said.

"These deficiencies have resulted in violations of state and local foreclosure laws, regulations, or rules and have had an adverse affect on the functioning of the mortgage markets and the U.S. economy as a whole." Walsh said even though the process of outlining new guidelines for servicers is at its early stage, regulators intend to address some of the pressing issues they discovered while investigating the servicing process — namely a lack of national standards for the foreclosure process and borrower confusion over whom to contact in foreclosure cases due to uncertain protocols.

Walsh's report on the investigation of loan servicing firms comes on the heels of a major announcement from the Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS. MERS, which is an electronic registry of mortgage records, informed members late Wednesday that they are now prohibited from foreclosing on residential loans using the MERS name. MERS has long been the target of foreclosure defense attorneys and consumer advocates for creating a foreclosure process that fails to create transparent oversight and protocols.

Walsh said as part of their comprehensive examination of servicing shops, regulators examined Lender Processing Services Inc. (LPS), MERSCORP, the parent company of MERS, and MERS itself. After reviewing the servicing shops and examining bank self assessments, as well as 2,800 foreclosure cases, Walsh said investigators concluded that there were "significant weaknesses in mortgage servicing related to foreclosure oversight and operations." He said regulators have yet to finalize their proposed guidelines, but that will be the next step in the process.

NAR - GSE's should maintain public involvement

According to the National Association of Realtors’ recommendations for restructuring the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), continued government participation in the secondary mortgage market is essential to ensuring affordable and available home mortgages to qualified consumers when private lenders withdraw from the market. NAR’s recommended plan is to restructure the entities as government-chartered, non-shareholder owned authorities that protect taxpayers and ensure continued access to affordable mortgages for consumers who are willing and able to assume the responsibilities of the American Dream of home ownership. NAR believes the previous structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with private profits and taxpayer loss must never recur; however, without some level of government backing of the most basic, simple mortgages – such as the 30-year fixed rate product – interest rates and mortgage fees will be notably higher for consumers and could severely restric
t access to credit, especially during down or disruptive markets. The recent economic downturn, for example, caused private capital to flee the marketplace; government backing of residential mortgages was critical in providing capital to borrowers and without their support the financial crisis could have been far worse.

NAR encourages private market solutions and innovations such as covered bonds for less traditional mortgages. However, a full privatization across all mortgage products will inevitably put taxpayers at risk. Given the very high concentration in the banking industry, the market will be vulnerable to tacit collusion and too-big-to-fail mistakes. The restructured GSEs under NAR’s plan would guarantee or ensure a wide range of safe, reliable mortgage products such as 15- and 30-year fixed rate loans. Sound and sensible loan underwriting standards would need to be established. NAR’s plan would require the entities to be fully self-financing and subject to tight regulations on product, revenue generation and usage in a way that ensures they can accomplish their mission and protect taxpayer dollars.

Revised Appraisal Guidelines Haunt Investors

Revised appraisal guidelines haunt investors
Posted on January 28, 2011

Just in case you haven’t run into it yet, our wise government – particularly the agencies that oversee mortgages – instituted more new guidelines in December that are just now starting to affect real estate investors. Effective Dec. 2010, in order to continue policing the mortgage industry, the Federal Reserve System engaged new policies for Automated Valuation Models on appraisals. (See http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20101202a.htm) The newest guidelines require “interagency cooperation” in inputting data into the huge property database. These agencies include the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), FDIC, Office of Thrift Supervision, Federal Reserve System, and the National Credit Union Administration. Further, the guideline goes one step further requiring actual visits to the property for a property condition report. Certainly, this inspection is needed in many circumstances. However, it does slow the process down by several more days and, on REO and foreclosure properties oft times, this can be the kiss of death.

How does this affect you? If you are a real estate investor that uses mortgage financing on potential rentals or flips, you may run into a new set of appraisal problems. Most affected are non-owner occupied loans, second mortgages, and lines of credit. If you’re one of those rare birds that still has a line of credit in place, it means when the bank is reviewing their collateral for the line, your ability to borrow may be reduced – sometimes drastically.

For potential new homebuyers, this doesn’t change things much. If it is an owner occupied property for a traditional or FHA first mortgage, lending institutions policies on appraisals are fairly close to the same as they were prior to December 2010. Some, however, have gone to the “two appraisal” rule. This means, to be safe, they are requiring two independent appraisals on each property. Whether they select one appraisal to go with, choose the lower of the two, or average the two varies with each institution.

Bottom line: In the near future, if you have been dependent on mortgages to purchase investment properties, you may want to adjust your business model. Several investors I know have already been shocked by hugely reduced values lenders are willing to do on investment properties. This is no fun when you’re expecting to have a closing. So, to be safe, do one of two things: (1) Use property you already own to collateralize lines of credit. Realize there must be plenty of equity available to do this smoothly; or (2) Even if you do fewer transactions, simply pay cash. Whether this is your own funds or those of an angel investor doesn’t matter. Paying cash is and has always been the path of least resistance. All others to the back of the line.

New sales contracts on the increase; median price still holding steady

(December 13, 2010 – Orlando, FL) Members of the Orlando Regional REALTOR Association reported an increase in the number of home-sale contracts they filed in November, with 3,243 newly filed contracts topping last November’s tally of 3,023 by 7.28 percent.

The area’s pending sales statistic — like new contracts — is also an indicator of future sales activity. A total of 8,998 homes are currently under contract and awaiting closing. This number is also an increase (of 4.23 percent) over the 8,633 homes that were under contract in November 2009.

Members of ORRA recorded completed sales on 1,848 homes in November, which is a 20.65 percent decrease over the November 2009 tally of 2,329 sales. To date, Orlando area home sales are up 21.55 percent over this time in 2009.

“Uneven sales patterns are to be expected over the next months,” explains ORRA Chairman of the Board Mike McGraw, McGraw Real Estate Services. “We are experiencing aftershocks from slowdowns caused by the homebuyer tax credit ending and the temporary foreclosure stoppage. But at the same time, buyers who are responding to record-low interest rates and enticingly low home prices are contributing to a push-pull effect on Orlando’s housing market.”

The median sales price of all homes sold in the Orlando area held steady at $105,000 during November, the third month in a row. According to ORRA the current median price remains 5.11 percent higher than the $99,900 median price recorded in August 2010 and is 14.63 percent below the median price of $123,000 recorded in November 2009.

The median price for “normal” existing homes – i.e., those that are neither a short sale nor a foreclosure – sold in November is $159,900. The median price for bank-owned sales is $78,101 and the median price for short sales is $99,950. The lower median prices of bank-owned and short sales, which accounted for 66.67 percent of all sales in November, exert a downward influence on the overall median price.

The Orlando affordability index decreased to 261.95 percent in November. (An affordability index of 99 percent means that buyers earning the state-reported median income are 1 percent short of the income necessary to purchase a median-priced home. Conversely, an affordability index that is over 100 means that median-income earners make more than is necessary to qualify for a median-priced home.) Buyers who earn the reported median income of $53,390 can qualify to purchase one of 9,027 homes in Orange and Seminole counties currently listed in the local multiple listing service for $275,049 or less.

First-time homebuyer affordability in November decreased to 186.28 percent. First-time buyers who earn the reported median income of $36,305 can qualify to purchase one of 6,493 homes in Orange and Seminole counties currently listed in the local multiple listing service for $166,252 or less.

Homes of all types spent an average of 97 days on the market before coming under contract in November 2010, and the average home sold for 94.08 percent of its listing price. In November 2009 those numbers were 85 and 94.90 percent, respectively. The area’s average interest rate increased in November to 4.48 percent.

Inventory

There are currently 15,192 homes available for purchase through the MLS. Inventory decreased by 249 homes (1.61 percent) from October 2010, which means that 249 more homes exited the market than entered the market. The November 2010 inventory level is 5.06 percent lower than it was in November 2009 (16,002). The current pace of sales translates into 8.22 months of supply; November 2009 recorded 6.87 months of supply.

There are 12,083 single-family homes currently listed in the MLS, a number that is 2.85 percent more than the 11,748 single-family homes listed in November of last year. Condos currently make up 1,871 offerings in the MLS, while duplexes/town homes/villas make up the remaining 1,238.

Condos and Town Homes/Duplexes/Villas

The sales of condos in the Orlando area decreased by 6.45 percent in November when compared to November of 2009 and decreased by 16.59 percent compared to October of this year. To date, condo sales are up 53.77 percent (6,031 condos sold to date in 2010, compared to 3,922 by this time in 2009).

The most (193) condos in a single price category that changed hands in October were yet again in the $1 - $50,000 price range, a year-long trend that accounts for 54.50 percent of all condo sales. The next greatest range, with 12.09 percent of this year’s condo sales, is the $50,000 - $60,000 category.

Orlando homebuyers purchased 178 duplexes, town homes, and villas in November 2010, which is a 24.89 percent decline from November 2009 when 237 of these alternative housing types were purchased.

MSA Numbers

Sales of existing homes within the entire Orlando MSA (Lake, Orange, Osceola, and Seminole counties) in November were down by 19.13 percent when compared to November of 2009. Throughout the MSA, 2,295 homes were sold in November 2010 compared with 2,838 in November 2009.

To date, sales throughout the MSA are 16.72 percent above this time in 2009 with 31,988 homes exchanging hands compared to 27,406. Each individual county’s year-to-date sales comparisons are as follows:

Lake: 2.06 percent above 2009 (3,827 homes sold to date in 2010 compared to 3,728 in 2009);
Orange: 18.17 percent above 2009 (17,223 homes sold to date in 2010 compared to 14,575 in 2009);
Osceola: 12.12 percent above 2009 (5,774 homes sold to date in 2010 compared to 5150 in 2009); and
Seminole: 30.63 percent above 2009 (5,164 sold to date in 2010 compared to 3,953 in 2009).

For detailed statistical reports, please visit www.orlrealtor.com and click on “Housing Statistics” on the top menu bar. This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by the Orlando Regional REALTOR® Association or its Multiple Listing Service (MLS). Neither the association nor its MLS guarantees or is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by the association or its MLS may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. Due to late closings, an adjustment is necessary to record those closings posted after our reporting date.

ORRA REALTOR® sales, referred to as the core market, represent all sales by members of the Orlando Regional REALTOR® Association, not necessarily those sales strictly in Orange and Seminole counties. Note that statistics released each month may be revised in the future as new data is received.

Orlando MSA numbers reflect sales of homes located in Orange, Seminole, Osceola, and Lake counties by members of any Realtor® association, not just members of ORRA.