shame on the GOP candidates

shame on the GOP candidates

"Shame on the Republican candidates for president. Shame on them for showing up at debate specifically targeting the US economy with not one credible, rational, even reputable notion of what to do about the nation's housing mess. It baffles the mind that this sector of the economy, responsible for about 18 percent of the nation's gross domestic product, is in freefall, and yet eight potential new leaders of this nation not only don't understand the problem but don't have a clue what to do about it. My favorite, and I write this with as much sarcasm as a computer keyboard will afford, is the argument that the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill is to blame for housing's current despair. Foreclosures, falling home prices, negative equity, nil consumer confidence, record low home building...yep, gotta be Dodd-Frank. 'If the Republican House next week would repeal Dodd-Frank and allow us to put pressure on the Senate to repeal Dodd-Frank, you would see the housing market start to improve overnight,' Speaker Newt Gingrich told the crowd in Michigan last night. His reasoning is that, 'It kills small banks, it kills small business.'

Increased regulation has certainly made the life of a banker today tougher, but the fact that there was zero regulation ten years ago allowed and encouraged reckless behavior on Wall Street. It created the supremely negligent subprime mortgage
trading bonanza that brought down big banks, little banks and homeowners alike...and threatened to take down the entire US economy. Were we to do nothing to change that? And Mr. Gingrich, if I may, how would repealing Dodd-Frank suddenly help the 4 million borrowers behind on their mortgages today and the 2.2 million in the foreclosure process today keep their homes? How would it put a bottom on home prices? Do you honestly believe that it would suddenly open the mortgage markets wide, allow banks to somehow fix all the troubled loans on their books and fuel a gigantic lending spree that would ignite home buying and selling again like the good old days? Is that even what we want? Let me just finish with Mr. Gingrich's last note, 'The banks are actually profiting more by foreclosing than encouraging short sales.' That's just flat out wrong.

To begin with what bank has ever profited from a foreclosure OR a short sale? Industry sources tell me that a short sale nets the bank on average 20 percent more than a foreclosure. Short sales speed up the time frame for disposal of the property as well, as foreclosures can take years to process. During that time, foreclosed borrowers can destroy the property, flushing cement down the toilet and stealing everything in the home that is and isn't nailed down. In a short sale, the homeowner lives in the home until the deal is done, and because they are not getting a huge hit to their credit and being kicked out by a sheriff's deputy, they generally don't destroy the house. In a short sale, the bank knows exactly what it's getting, unlike in a foreclosure when the bank has to take back the house in some unknown condition, market it and re-sell it at an unknown distressed price. 'Nuff said.

My second favorite argument is that it's all Fannie and Freddie's fault, and if we take them down, housing comes back in a flash. 'For these geniuses to give 10 of their top executives bonuses at $12 million and then have the guts to come to the American people and say, 'Give us another $13 billion to bail us out just for the quarter,' that's lunacy,' Rep. Michelle Bachmann argued on CNBC last night. 'We need to put them back into bankruptcy and get them out of business. They're destroying the housing market.' No question, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are bleeding money, costing the taxpayers billions already and potentially billions more in the near future. Something needs to be done to change that, but 'bankrupting' Fannie and Freddie would take down the US economy as we know it, and it boggles the mind that a person running for president wouldn't understand that. She in fact noted that Fannie and Freddie support the bulk of the mortgage market. That's true. Without them there would be no lending. Does she think the private market would just come running back in and give the nation's beleaguered borrowers 3.99 percent 30-year fixed across the board? Only Herman Cain seemed to get that. He argued that we need to fix unemployment first with his various proposals. 'Okay. After I did those three things that I outlined, then deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. You don't start solving a problem right in the middle of it. So we've got to do that first,' he reasoned.

Fixing unemployment was the only housing plan the candidates could offer. When CNBC's Maria Bartiromo asked Governor Mitt Romney, 'Not one of your 59 points in your economic plan mentions or addresses housing. Can you tell us why?' He responded, 'Yes, because it's not a housing plan. It's a jobs plan.' I don't love that answer, but at least I can respect it. 'Our friends in Washington today, they say, 'Oh, if we've got a problem in housing, let's let government play a bigger role.' That's the wrong way to go. Let markets work. Help people get back to work. Let them buy homes. You'll see home prices come back up if we allow this market to work,' argued Romney. There are plenty of analysts who agree that the market needs to work itself out, as painful as that may be to average Americans, many of whom are in line to lose their homes. Until the foreclosure mess runs its course, and all those homes are filled with borrowers who can afford them, home prices will not recover, plain and simple, goes the argument. I'm not saying here that the Obama Administration has done anything particular stellar to stimulate a housing recovery. A small refinance program for underwater borrowers isn't the cure-all, and forcing banks to write down mortgage principal is not politically nor technically feasible. But without some plan, this crisis could go on for a decade, like it did in Japan, as President Clinton noted recently in an interview. I'm not saying I have the answer, the great plan to fix our nation's housing crisis. But I'm not running for president."

New foreclosure plan

Big investors are showing interest in an evolving Obama administration plan to sell off foreclosed homes, although the government will have to make the offer sweet enough to coax private funds. The White House is assessing how best to encourage private companies and investors to snap up foreclosed properties held by the government and convert them into rentals. Officials want private partners to take over as much as $30 billion in single-family properties that are currently on the books of government-run Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration। Several money managers with large fixed income funds are interested, according to sources, and a request for ideas on how to construct a program received nearly 4,000 responses. The foreclosure conversion program would come as the next step to complement other government supports for housing, including an expanded refinance program announced on Monday.

The main question for prospective investors, which include broker-dealers and firms already overseeing similar rental programs, is the type of financing the government will make available—an issue officials are still struggling with. "In order to get a better bid, there has to be some incentive involved to get qualified investors involved," said Ron D'Vari, co-founder and chief executive of NewOak Capital. "The reality is not a lack of interest, but so far it looks like a lack of financing." Incentives could include low interest rates, tax benefits or some type of rental assistance, said D'Vari, a portfolio adviser who has been involved in mini-bulk auctions of real estate-owned properties, or REOs, in California. REO properties are those acquired by a lender, whether a bank or the government, after an unsuccessful auction attempt. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA own about 250,000 properties, close to a third of the country's REO pool.

One key challenge would be finding big enough blocks of properties in specific geographic areas that could be sold at one time. Analysts say this is what it would take to make the program attractive to large institutional investors. The transaction and liability costs property managers will face as they try to bring deserted units back up to code also pose a hurdle. The government also needs to determine how it will protect taxpayers, and it might explore ways to pair up with investors and allow Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA to keep some type of an ownership stake in the rental properties. A public-private partnership, somewhat along the lines of a program the Treasury tried to use to soak up toxic bank assets during the financial crisis, would allow the government to gain from the sales. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA have already undertaken some small efforts to reduce the backlog of foreclosed homes. They have donated a few vacant properties for demolition and have held some small auctions. Having already received $141 billion in taxpayer support since being seized by the government in 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie are under enormous pressure to make sure they maximize the returns from the properties they hold. "This has got to be thought out. Fannie and Freddie would need to assess if they are getting the return they need from a rental," said Ken H. Johnson, a real estate professor at Florida International University. Johnson said one way to get over the hurdle would be for the two agencies to be given an explicit mission of market stabilization.

new wave of foreclosures coming

"Bank of America is ramping up its foreclosure processing, sending out far more notices of default to borrowers in August than in previous months, well over 200% more month-to-month. A notice of default is the first stage of the foreclosure process in non-judicial foreclosures states, that is, where foreclosures do not go before a judge. The notice of default is usually sent when a borrower is 90 days or more overdue in payments, but that timeline has been extended significantly during this housing crisis, due to the so-called 'robo-signing' processing scandal and the sheer volume of troubled loans.

Mortgage and housing analyst and strategist Mark Hanson alerted me to unusually high legal default filing activity, and his research points to Bank of America as the primary driver. I contacted a Bank of America spokesman, who responded: 'It appears the numbers you noted to me this afternoon generally track with our own numbers for key categories. It should be noted it’s driven more in key states like California and Nevada than overall, and certainly the progress we’re seeing is limited to non-judicial states. Judicial states continue to move very slowly, with key states like New Jersey only beginning to start processing foreclosures again this month.'

The foreclosure numbers are down very slightly year-over-year, but only because August 2010 was one of the highest foreclosure months on record, and of course was just before the 'robo-signing' scandal was uncovered. Delays in processing have artificially lowered the foreclosure numbers over the past year, so this new surge is likely addressing loans that have been long delinquent, but unaddressed. In other words, the foreclosure pipeline is filling again. RealtyTrac, a widely followed foreclosure sale and data site, is also confirming a surge in overall notices of default in its August numbers, to be released later this week. They do not cite Bank of America specifically, which bought Countrywide Financial, taking on millions of troubled loans. 'We've been seeing REO [bank-owned property] sales, and processing of loans through foreclosure. This increase may simply be the lenders and servicers starting the next cycle. August traditionally is a high month for foreclosure actions, so part of the increase might be seasonal,' says RealtyTrac's Rick Sharga. 'Could be any number of reasons - but with 3.5 million delinquent loans, this had to happen sooner or later.'

The question of course is, is this a one month catch-up purge or will it continue at high levels for a while? And if the latter, will other banks follow suit quickly? Because if other banks see Bank of America pushing more loans to foreclosure, which will inevitably means more properties heading out for sale, they may want to get in before that glut of properties pushes prices down even further. 'This proves once again that 'credit' as measured by legal defaults and foreclosures is not necessarily about borrowers missing payments, rather about what the servicers chose to do about it,' notes Hanson."

Shadow inventory improves but still threatens housing recovery

Despite all those millions of distressed properties out on sale, depressing home prices even further, there is one glimmer of hope according Standard & Poor. According to the report the time it would take for banks to purge all of this so-called "shadow inventory" from the market (through foreclosure sales, mortgage modifications and other measures) shrunk to 47 months during the second quarter, a significant drop from the 52 months it estimated for the first quarter of this year. The report also found that the total dollar value of the loans on these properties -- known as non-agency loans because they are not backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the Federal Housing Administration -- also fell to $405 billion at the end of June from $433 billion three months earlier. S&P said the decline was helped by stabilizing liquidation rates and by fewer borrowers falling behind on their mortgage payments as the economy slowly recovered during the quarter.

S&P estimates that there are still a total of between 4 million and 5 million homes, including those with agency-backed loans, in shadow inventory, an amount that continues to jeopardize the housing market's recovery. Nevertheless, Fannie and Freddie are looking to rid themselves of a large percentage the shadow inventory they do have -- and quickly. Earlier this month, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Treasury Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development were seeking suggestions on how to dispose all the repossessed homes now owned by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration in a way that would benefit local communities.

Refinance Applications Increase

Mortgage applications increased 4.1 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending August 12, 2011. The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 4.1 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 3.6 percent compared with the previous week and was 13.5 percent lower than a year ago. The Refinance Index increased 8.0 percent from the previous week, but was 16.3 percent lower than the same week last year. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 9.1 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 10.1 percent compared with the previous week and was 1.1 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

“Unprecedented volatility in the stock market last week amid additional signs that the economy has slowed led to further drops in mortgage rates, with the 15-year rate teaching a new low for the MBA survey,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President
of Research and Economics. Fratantoni continued, “The big differences in refinance volumes were likely driven by the decisions of some lenders not to drop rates last week, largely due to the need to manage their pipelines.” The four week moving average for the seasonally adjusted Market Index is up 6.9 percent. The four week moving average is down 2.2 percent for the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index, while this average is up 10.1 percent for the Refinance Index. The adjustable-rate mortgage
(ARM) share of activity decreased to 5.8 percent from 6.1 percent of total applications from the previous week. The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.32 percent from 4.37 percent. The 30-year fixed contract rate has decreased for three straight weeks and is at a new low
for this year.

Will you sell your house after 2012?

YOU SELL YOUR HOUSE AFTER 2012? This Is True… Will you ever sell your house after 2012? Call your Democratic Senator’s Office to confirm this hidden fact about the ObamaCare regulation. Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That’s $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It’s in the health care bill. Just thought you should know. SALES TAX GOES INTO EFFECT 2013 (Part of HC Bill). Why 2013? Could it be to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? REAL ESTATE SALES TAX So, this is “change you can believe in”? Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax. The bulk of these new taxes don’t kick in until 2013
If you sell your $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Does this stuff make your November and 2012 vote more important? Oh, you weren’t aware this was in the obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren’t alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren’t aware of it either http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home I hope you forward this to every single person in your address book. VOTERS NEED TO KNOW.

BEREL Sunday International Investing Edition: Wells Fargo Turns to Ireland for Loan Portfolios

Posted by Carole VanSickle on Sunday, August 14th 2011

In a $1.4 billion deal, Wells Fargo has won the Bank of Ireland’s U.S. commercial-real-estate loan portfolio as the Irish bank attempts to deleverage its assets. The portfolio consists of 25 loans sold at close to face value and backed primarily by properties in New York, Boston and Washington[1]. The Bank of Ireland was ordered by Ireland’s financial regulator to deleverage by cutting the lender’s loan portfolio by $43 billion by the end of 2013. Wells Fargo also purchased an additional $1 billion in loans from Allied Irish Banks earlier this year and is now taking aim at a $9.5 billion portfolio of loans in the offing from the Anglo Irish Bank Corporation. The latter includes commercial “trophy properties” in New York City and Chicago.

JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are also after the Anglo Irish Bank portfolio and have submitted bids on it[2]. Most of the loans are expected to perform through maturity. The sale will also be the first of its kind, since “this is the first foreign bank to sell its entire U.S. loan portfolio, and it will be good test of the market,” said head of global real estate practice at law firm Greenberg Traurig, Robert Ivanhoe.

Do you think it’s a good thing that American lenders are buying back American loans, or should they be doing other things with these billions of dollars?

Mortgage markets in the U.S., which remain on government life support, could be rattled by the downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, potentially raising borrowing costs for consumers. Given the "sufficiently perilous" state of the U.S. mortgage market, a downgrade "can do nothing but harm the market," says Karen Shaw Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, a research firm in Washington. "The question is how much?" To be sure, no one knows for certain the impact of the unprecedented downgrade on the mortgage market, even if that market is fundamentally intertwined with the federal government.

One concern is that downgrades may trigger forced selling by mutual funds or foreign investors to comply with investor-specific capital requirements restricting them to assets rated triple-A. But analysts said that most institutional investors' rules for investing in government-backed mortgage debt aren't contingent on ratings. And with investors seeking traditional safe-haven assets such as Treasury and government-backed mortgage securities, "there just doesn't seem to be much else to invest in," says Andrew Davidson, a mortgage-industry consultant in New York. "What would people put
their money in if they sold their agency mortgages? It's hard to see what the trade is."

Mortgage rates are closely tied to yields on the 10-year Treasury note. Rising demand for Treasurys pushed down yields over the past two weeks, even as the threat of a U.S. default from the debt-ceiling debate in Washington dragged on, because investors looked for less risky assets amid concerns over the European debt crisis and the sluggish U.S. economy. Mortgage rates dropped to an eight-month low last week, with 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaging 4.39% for the week ended Thursday, according to a survey by Freddie Mac. Still, the uncertainty created by the downgrade has nvestors on edge. The interplay of a downgrade, on top of the euro-zone crisis and renewed fears over a double-dip recession in the U.S., could lead to increased volatility in mortgage markets. "There are so many moving parts to this that no one really knows how it will go," says Mr.Simon.

MBA - homeownership may drop further

The drop in the homeownership rate from an all-time high of 69.2% in 2004 to 66.4% in the first quarter of 2011 reflects a decline from unsustainable levels to something closer to historicalaverages, according to a study released today by Mortgage Banker's Association's (MBA) Research Institute for Housing America (RIHA). While the homeownership rate may have bottomed out, it could fall another one or two percentage points because of tightened credit and other factors, the paper says. Titled "Homeownership Boom and Bust 2000 to 2009: Where Will the Homeownership Rate Go from Here?," the study was conducted by professors Stuart Gabriel of UCLA's Anderson School and Stuart Rosenthal of Syracuse University. They found that the increase in the homeownership rate in the middle of the last decade extended to all age groups but was most pronounced among individuals under age 30. These increases coincided with looser credit conditions that enhanced household access to mortgage credit, along with less risk-averse attitudes toward investment in homeownership. Following the crash, these trends have reversed and homeownership rates have largely reverted to the levels of 2000.

"How much more might the homeownership rate fall? The answer depends on uncertain forecasts of attitudes towards homeownership and changes in the credit market and economic conditions," concluded Rosenthal. "If underwriting conditions and attitudes about investing in homeownership settle back to year-2000 patterns and, if the socioeconomic and demographic traits of the population look similar to those of 2000, then the homeownership rate may have bottomed out and will not decline further. If, instead, household employment, earnings and other socioeconomic characteristics over the next few years remain similar to those in 2009, then homeownership rates could fall by up to another 1 to 2%age points beyond 2011. Those declines are likely to be greatest in cities and regions in which house prices were most volatile in the last decade."

Wells Fargo modification outnumber Obama's 5 to 1

Wells Fargo completed or started trials on roughly 585,000 mortgage modifications through its private programs since the beginning of 2009, more than five times the 101,000 initiated through the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP launched in March 2009 but almost immediately drew criticism. Treasury officials admit the more than 3 million modifications initially promised was over estimated. Through May, servicers started roughly 731,000 permanent loan modifications and have been averaging between 25,000 and 30,000 per month this year. According to a recent poll of housing counselors, only 9% of borrowers who entered the program described it as a "positive" experience. Homeowners continually blame servicers for mishandling documentation. Overwhelmed servicers point out many borrowers are simply out of reach. "Avoiding foreclosure is a top priority for us and when customers work with us, we can help seven of every 10 to stay out of foreclosure," said Teri Schrettenbrunner, senior vice president, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.

The Treasury points out most of the private programs built since the foreclosure crisis use HAMP as a model. But since mishandled foreclosure and modification processes came to light late last year, new standards were put in place, including a single point of contact that servicers are required to provide throughout the loss-mitigation process. The Treasury began to clamp down on poorly performing servicers — at least to the extent their contracts with these firms allow. In June, the Treasury announced it was withholding HAMP payments from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells. Schrettenbrunner said the bank continues to build on its primary contact model it established last summer, and the bank has met with 58,000 borrowers at 31 home preservation workshops. Half of those received a decision on the spot or shortly after the event. Schrettenbrunner said the department continues to "aggressively reach out" to borrowers behind on payments to bridge the communication gap as quickly as possible. "We also continue to aggressively reach out to customers 60 or more days behind on their home loans via mail and telephone in an effort to engage them," Schrettenbrunner said.

WSJ - mortgage rates flat

Mortgage rates changed little for a second straight week, according to the latest survey from Freddie Mac. Mortgage rates generally track Treasury yields, which move inversely to Treasury prices. Rates have slumped for months as yields on Treasury’s slid amid economic uncertainty. Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft pointed to more signs of a softening US housing market, including the Federal Reserve's policy-committee statement on Wednesday, which acknowledged continued weakness in the sector. "Although new construction on single-family homes ticked up in May from April, it was still below the overall pace set in 2010," Mr. Nothaft said. "Moreover, existing home sales fell 3.8% in May to the fewest since November 2010."

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was at 4.5% in the week ended Thursday, the same rate as in the previous week, though the rate was below last year's 4.69% average. The 30-year rate has fallen steadily since reaching the 2011 high of 5.05% in early February. Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages edged up to 3.69% from 3.67% the previous week but were down from 3.13% a year earlier. Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages decreased to 3.25%, down from 3.27% last week and 3.84% a year earlier. One-year Treasury-indexed ARM rates ticked up to 2.99% from 2.97% the prior week, but still well below the prior year's 3.77% rate. To obtain the rates, 30-year and 15-year fixed-rate borrowers required an average payment of 0.8 point and 0.7 point, respectively. Five-year hybrid adjustable rate mortgages required a 0.6-point payment, while one-year adjustable-rate mortgages required a 0.5-point payment. A point is 1% of the mortgage amount, charged as prepaid interest.

foreigners jump into real estate market

"Falling home prices may be plaguing the US economy, but they are candy to foreign investors, who already have a weak dollar on their side. Buyers from overseas spent roughly $41 billion on US residential real estate last year, a bump up from the previous year. US real estate agents report a surge this Spring especially, as foreign buyers see continued pressure on home prices and ample bargains. 'I don’t think they’re so concerned about the prices dropping as they are about getting value for their money,' says Rick Ambrose, a Coldwell Banker agent in Lake Mohawk, NJ. Ambrose and his colleague Mary Pat Spekhardt recently hosted two groups of Japanese investors searching for homes on the scenic lake just about an hour outside of New York City. 'They can work here, be close to the city, be close to their corporations and still feel like they’re on vacation. I think that’s really what grabbed everybody.

That’s what got them,' says Spekhardt. The group of about 35 from Japan also toured properties in Las Vegas and Los Angeles, which are more popular choices among foreign investors.

A new survey by Trulia.com that tracks searches from potential foreign buyers found LA ranked number one in potential interest traffic, trailed by New York City, Cape Coral, Fl, Fort Lauderdale, FL and Las Vegas. The greatest interest is from buyers in the UK, Canada and Australia. 'Prices now in the US are generally 30-40% off from the peak. In addition, the weakness of the dollar gives the Japanese an advantage, as it does the Europeans, of another 20-25% off, so they’re seeing real bargains and opportunities,' notes Ambrose. The interest is pretty widespread, with Brazilians trolling Miami and Russians and Chinese hunting in Chicago, according to Trulia's survey.

What's so interesting to me, though, is that foreigners are so much more ready to jump into the market now than US investors. Granted, they have, as noted, the weak dollar on their side, but they also seem to have a longer term view. US buyers are so afraid to lose a little in the short term on paper, they don't realize they could gain a lot in the long term. Of course foreign buyers are largely using cash, which many US buyers are lacking. Credit, or lack thereof, is playing against the US investor. Prices in Miami are actually beginning to recover, especially in the condo market, thanks to foreign buyers, so much so that the foreigners are beating out the Americans.

I remember all the rage a long time ago when the Japanese were buying up commercial real estate in New York City. Everyone was so appalled. Not so much now, even up in Lake Mohawk, NJ...'It isn’t popular. It is unforeseen territory, and it’s unique. I think it’s a very smart choice. It’s not where everyone is looking,' says Spekhardt."

US economy "bumbling along"

The US economy is just "bumbling along" and creating an uncertainty among business that is likely to stifle hiring and growth, says investor Wilbur Ross, fund manager and head of W.L. Ross & Co. Ross blamed Washington policies for much of the
problems, from the lack of a housing recovery to the recent controversy in which the Obama administration is trying to block Boeing from building a plant in a right-to-work state. "It's not going to be a 'W' or a 'V' or an 'L' (recovery) or another
alphabet letter," said Ross. "It's going continue to be punctuation—dots, dashes, question marks, exclamation points,one strong month, one weak month—a very fragile economy."

That lack of direction could stand in the way of businesses that want to expand. "This kind of thing is bad because it's unsettling to companies," he said. "Business has a terrible time adjusting to uncertainty. Good news they can adjust to, bad news
they can adjust to. Uncertainty makes it very, very hard to make long-term commitments." Businesses also are facing weak consumer spending. Unemployment remains mired at 9.1 percent while housing prices recently have double dipped despite aggressive efforts in Washington to stem the crisis. "The consumer still hasn't been
rehabilitated," Ross said. "All the meddling in the real estate side of life has not fixed residential real estate. If anything I think it's made it worse because it's extending out the foreclosure time lines and putting more uncertainty and more
downward pressure."

Ross also wondered about the state of job creation considering the battle the National Labor Relations Board has waged against Boeing. The agency contends that Boeing broke the law when it moved a plant to South Carolina, where workers are not required
to belong to a union. Boeing contends that even though it has a unionized work force it also can build plants in right-to-work states. Some in Congress have called on cutting funding to the NLRB on ground that the agency has overstepped its authority.
For Ross, the issue comes down to the kind of message the administration is sending at a time when job creation is at a premium. "Who in American business is going to have confidence to build a new factory, add employees, if you're not even sure
you can build the factory where you want to?" he said. "You can't have social experimenting interfering with turning the economy around. And I think that's what's going on here. It's social experimenting instead of building the economy."

Fannie Freddie are better, but still cash drains

Conservatorship has been good for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but
the companies continue to drain federal resources away from other
government operations, according to the regulator of the mortgage
giants. In its third annual letter to Congress, the Federal
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA ) said stronger loan underwriting
standards enabled the companies to narrow losses in 2010 to $28
billion from $93.6 billion a year earlier. The companies have
received more than $160 billion funding from the Treasury
Department the past few years. "Since being placed under
conservatorship in 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remain
critical supervisory concerns," said Edward DeMarco, acting
director of the FHFA. This is a "result of continuing credit
losses in 2010 from loans originated during 2005 through 2007 as
well as forecasted losses from loans originated during that
time." Still, DeMarco said governmental control allowed the
companies to "accomplish their statutory mission of facilitating
stability and liquidity for single-family and multifamily housing
finance."

The FHFA said Fannie and Freddie remain plagued by "credit risk,
operational risk, modeling risks and retention of qualified
leadership and personnel." The companies hold a 60% share of
single-family loan production. As conservator, the FHFA is
tasked with minimizing credit losses at the GSEs, and DeMarco
said more stringent underwriting standards and a stronger price
structure have helped. "Although past business decisions leading
to these losses cannot be undone, each enterprise, under the
oversight and guidance of FHFA as conservator and regulator, has
improved underwriting standards for loan purchases in the past
two years.," he said. "Another way FHFA minimized losses was to
require the enterprises to enforce existing contractual
representation and warranty loan repurchase agreements with
lenders." The FHFA also oversees the dozen Federal Home Loan
Banks and said all 12 reported profits in 2010. Loans to the
banks dropped to $479 billion last year from $631 billion at the
end 2009. The regulator said the banks' financial condition and
performance stabilized in 2010, but several continue "to be
negatively affected by their exposure to private-label
mortgage-backed securities."

why should we care about foreclosures?

"Earlier this week, when we got the report of a bump up in sales
of newly constructed homes, I cautioned that the home builders
are still facing huge competition from distressed properties
(foreclosures and short sales). Today we have some new numbers
showing just how big and how widespread that competition is.
Foreclosed properties made up 28% of all home sales nationwide in
the first quarter of this year, according to RealtyTrac. That's
up slightly from Q4 of 2010, but not the record 29% we saw a year
ago. More than 107,000 bank-owned (REO) properties sold, which is
actually a drop from the previous quarter and a bigger drop (36%)
from a year ago. Foreclosed properties sold at a 35% discount to
their non-distressed counterparts.

So here we have fewer selling but making up a larger share of
total sales. That's not particularly healthy. We need to get more
of these properties sold, because as I showed you on the blog
Tuesday, there are hundreds of thousands of them and millions
more in the potential pipeline. This is not exactly news, but
every time I report it I get the argument back here on the blog
that these distressed sales are only happening in certain states
and don't affect the overall housing market. There is some truth
to that, at least the first part. I asked RealtyTrac to pull some
other numbers for me to show what I'm talking about. More than
three quarters of all distressed sales (78%) were in just ten
states. You can see the usual suspects, California, Florida,
Arizona, Nevada and much of the Mid-West. That's a problem for
the builders because so much of their most recent inventory is in
those states. But what about the rest of us? It begs two
questions: 1) If I don't live in these states, why should I care?
2) If the worst is only in a few states, then why are home prices
falling nationwide?

Here's RealtyTrac's Rick Sharga's explanation: 'The 10 states
include several of the states with the highest number of overall
home sales; driving prices down in California and Florida has
much more impact on national averages than fluctuating home
prices in Alaska and Wyoming. It's not all about geography.
While foreclosure sales obviously depress the price of homes
nearby, they also affect prices by limiting new home sales, which
typically help drive home prices up. But foreclosure sales are
only one of the factors behind falling home prices. Weak demand
is probably the biggest driver.'

And I contend that weak demand is driven by several factors, not
the least of which are credit and confidence. The banks are
looking at their overall book of business and the losses they're
still taking; the losses are concentrated in those states that
are continuing to suffer the most. Regardless, they spread that
pain nationwide in their lending standards, tightening up to the
point that many borrowers far far away from California can't get
a loan. Confidence, or lack thereof, is a bigger factor than we
often give it credit. Yes, the big bad media report all these
numbers, and yes, some of the worst of it is nowhere near where
you live, but you see and process it. It affects your confidence
and consequently how you act.

Housing demand is nowhere near where it should be, and the mix of
what is selling is all on the low end. Investors with cash and
first time home buyers are bargain hunting, and that pushes the
price average/median down in every market. As prices fall on real
sales, thousands of borrowers fall underwater on paper...on their
mortgages, and that puts them at higher risk of foreclosure.
'Residential home sales fell by 18% in Q1 2011 compared to Q4
2010 and by almost 32% from Q1 2010,' notes Sharga. Foreclosures
and distressed sales, even if they're not in your back yard or in
your state, affect your home's value because they affect the
overall demand for your home."

Pace of Orlando home sales remains strong in June

(July 12, 2010 – Orlando, FL) Strong homebuyer demand continued in June, elevating the level of home sales and increasing the area’s month-over-month median sales price for the sixth consecutive month. Members of the Orlando Regional REALTOR® Association reported completed sales on 2,834 homes in June, which is a 27.66 percent increase over the June 2009 mark of 2,220.


The number of new contracts filed in June 2010 (3,736) represents an increase of 1.36 percent more than were filed in June 2009 (3,686). The area’s pending sales statistic — also an indicator of future sales activity – is likewise remaining at a record high with 33.13 percent more homes (9,625) under contract and awaiting closing in June of this year than in June of last year (7,230).


And finally, the median price of all existing homes combined sold in June 2010 increased 0.87 percent to $116,000 from the $115,000 recorded in May 2010. June 2010’s median price is, however, a decrease of 11.57 percent compared to June 2009’s median of $131,175.


“Sales in June got a boost from the homebuyer tax credit, as buyers raced to close by the original deadline. The extended deadline of September 30, 2010 for closing tax credit eligible transactions will continue to increase sales in the next few months,” explains ORRA Chairman of the Board Kathleen Gallagher McIver, RE/MAX Town & Country Realty. “Even with the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit, buying conditions remain favorable. Affordability, historically low interest rates, and a great selection of homes make this an excellent time to buy a home in Orlando.”


June’s $116,000 median price encompasses all types of sales situations and home types. The median price for “normal” sales is $175,000 (up 9.38 percent from last month’s $160,000). The median price for bank-owned sales is $77,500 (down 4.32 percent from last month’s $81,000), and the median price for short sales is $115,526 (up 4.78 percent from last month’s $110,000).


Of the 2,834 sales in June, 911 “normal” sales accounted for 32.15 percent of all sales, while 1,211 bank-owned and 712 short sales made up 67.85 percent.


The Orlando affordability index decreased to 226.29 percent in June. (An affordability index of 99 percent means that buyers earning the state-reported median income are 1 percent short of the income necessary to purchase a median-priced home. Conversely, an affordability index that is over 100 means that median-income earners make more than is necessary to qualify for a median-priced home.) Buyers who earn the reported median income of $53,105 can qualify to purchase one of 12,178 homes in Orange and Seminole counties currently listed in the local multiple listing service for $262,496 or less.


First-time homebuyer affordability in June decreased to 160.92 percent. First-time buyers who earn the reported median income of $36,111 can qualify to purchase one of 8,204 homes in Orange and Seminole counties currently listed in the local multiple listing service for $158,664 or less.


Homes of all types spent an average of 85 days on the market before coming under contract in June 2010, and the average home sold for 95.33 percent of its listing price. In June 2009 those numbers were 104 and 93.83 percent, respectively. The area’s average interest rate decreased in June to 4.84 percent.


Inventory


There are currently 16,304 homes available for purchase through the MLS. Inventory increased by 341 homes from May 2010, which means that 341 more homes entered the market than left the market. The June 2010 inventory level is 8.56 percent lower than it was in June 2009 (17,831). The current pace of sales translates into 5.75 months of supply; June 2009 recorded 8.03 months of supply.


There are 12,353 single-family homes currently listed in the MLS, a number that is 509 (3.96 percent) less than in June of last year. Condos currently make up 2,568 offerings in the MLS, while duplexes/town homes/villas make up the remaining 1,383.


Condos and Town Homes/Duplexes/Villas


The sales of condos in the Orlando area increased by 48.54 percent in June when compared to June of 2009 and decreased by 4.99 percent compared to May of this year. To date, condo sales are up 85.20 percent (3,328 condos sold to date in 2010, compared to 1,797 by this time in 2009).


The most (326) condos in a single price category that changed hands in June were yet again in the $1 - $50,000 price range, which accounted for 53.53 percent of all condo sales.


Orlando homebuyers purchased 291 duplexes, town homes, and villas in June 2010, which is a 59.02 percent increase from June 2009 when 183 of these alternative housing types were purchased. Fifty duplexes, town homes, and villas sold in June 2010 fell into the $100,000 - $120,000 price categories.